LBR Mainlines - Revision history

Osai: R&D:LBR Mainlines moved to LBR Mainlines

2006-08-21T12:36:04Z

R&D:LBR Mainlines moved to LBR Mainlines

2006-08-08T10:28:07Z

2006-08-08T10:27:17Z

2006-08-07T23:13:56Z

2006-08-07T23:10:12Z

2006-08-07T23:06:48Z

2006-08-02T12:34:11Z

2006-07-30T15:27:41Z

2006-07-30T12:34:22Z

redone table layout

2006-07-29T21:50:19Z

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Left | Bidirectional | Right
-'''Current stage: ''' Examination - Watch traffic on the first live test track
+'''Current stage: ''' Research complete
 '''Pros:'''
 * Takes up less track than an LL_RR mainline and can be compressed more

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 * LBR (L__B__R) is easily upgradable to L_L_R_R when there isn't stuff in the way
-Overall, it allowed a higher volume of traffic than a normal LR mainline would have handled. It in comparison to an LL_RR mainline has not been done; However it could be assumed that with well designed junctions it would be similar. Look at the [http://openttdcoop.ppcis.org/blog/files/sandbox_archive/SandboxGame_11_Final.sav Savegame] to observe tour first implementation]
+Overall, it allowed a higher volume of traffic than a normal LR mainline would have handled. It in comparison to an LL_RR mainline has not been done; However it could be assumed that with well designed junctions it would be similar. Look at the [http://openttdcoop.ppcis.org/blog/files/sandbox_archive/SandboxGame_11_Final.sav Savegame] to observe our first implementation
 [[Category:Research]]

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 * LBR (L__B__R) is easily upgradable to L_L_R_R when there isn't stuff in the way
-Overall, it allowed a higher volume of traffic than a normal LR mainline would have handled. It in comparison to an LL_RR mainline has not been done; However it could be assumed that with well designed junctions it would be similar
+Overall, it allowed a higher volume of traffic than a normal LR mainline would have handled. It in comparison to an LL_RR mainline has not been done; However it could be assumed that with well designed junctions it would be similar. Look at the [http://openttdcoop.ppcis.org/blog/files/sandbox_archive/SandboxGame_11_Final.sav Savegame] to observe tour first implementation]
 [[Category:Research]]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 * Downgrades to LR more easily where needed
 * Allows both over and undertaking
-* Relatively easy to upgrade to LL_RR in future (Although the junction limitations remain)
+* Very easy to upgrade to L_L_R_R in future (Although the junction limitations remain)
 '''Cons:'''
 * More complex signalling
-* Lower capacity than LL_RR
+* Probable lower capacity than LL_RR (This has itself never been tested
 * Junction positions are restricted
@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 {{R&D_header|R&D Overview}}
-{{R&D_content|LBR Mainlines|[[User:OwenS|OwenS]]|checked|Done|checked|Done|checked|Done||checked|Suitable and works well for moderate traffic}}
+{{R&D_content|LBR Mainlines|[[User:OwenS|OwenS]]|checked|Done|checked|Done|checked|Done|Suitable and works well for moderate traffic|wip}}
-{{R&D_content|L_L_R_R Overtaking Mainlines|[[User:OwenS|OwenS]]|checked|Done|checked|Done|checked|Done|checked|Works well for high volumes of traffic}}
+{{R&D_content|L_L_R_R Overtaking Mainlines|[[User:OwenS|OwenS]]|checked|Done|checked|Done|checked|Done|Works well for high volumes of traffic|checked}}
-{{R&D_content|Multi speed trains with LBR and L_L_R_R Mainlines|[[User:OwenS|OwenS]]|checked|Done|checked|Done|checked|Done|checked|Works well with closely spaced overtaking points}}
+{{R&D_content|Multi speed trains with LBR and L_L_R_R Mainlines|[[User:OwenS|OwenS]]|checked|Done|checked|Done|checked|Done|Works well with closely spaced overtaking points|checked}}
 {{R&D_footer}}

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 {{R&D_header|R&D Overview}}
-{{R&D_content|LBR Mainlines|[[User:OwenS|OwenS]]|checked|Checked|wip|Examination|unclaimed|In progress| | }}
+{{R&D_content|LBR Mainlines|[[User:OwenS|OwenS]]|checked|Done|checked|Done|checked|Done||checked|Suitable and works well for moderate traffic}}
-{{R&D_content|L_L_R_R Overtaking Mainlines|[[User:OwenS|OwenS]]|checked|Checked|wip|Examination|unclaimed|In progress| | }}
+{{R&D_content|L_L_R_R Overtaking Mainlines|[[User:OwenS|OwenS]]|checked|Done|checked|Done|checked|Done|checked|Works well for high volumes of traffic}}
-{{R&D_content|Multi speed trains with LBR and L_L_R_R Mainlines|[[User:OwenS|OwenS]]|checked|Checked|wip|Examination|unclaimed|In progress| | }}
+{{R&D_content|Multi speed trains with LBR and L_L_R_R Mainlines|[[User:OwenS|OwenS]]|checked|Done|checked|Done|checked|Done|checked|Works well with closely spaced overtaking points}}
 {{R&D_footer}}
-== Observation Log ==
+== Initial Observation Log ==
 === 29th July 2006 ===
 With some signalling tweaks, trains are using it to overtake. They are also, however, using it to cut corners. Cheeky trains....
@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 We have also developed the first junction for this design.
 [[Category:Research]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:36, 21 August 2006
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:34, 2 August 2006
Line 42:		Line 42:
	We have also developed the first junction for this design.		We have also developed the first junction for this design.

−	[[Category:~~R&D~~]]	+	[[Category:Research]]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 '''Minimum width:''' 5 tiles: Primarily (L__B__R), Connectors (L_L_R_R)
-{{R&D|LBR Mainlines|[[User:OwenS|OwenS]]|checked|Checked|wip|Examination|unclaimed|In progress| | }}
+{{R&D_header|R&D Overview}}
-{{R&D|Multi speed trains with LBR Mainlines|[[User:OwenS|OwenS]]|checked|Checked|wip|Examination|unclaimed|In progress| | }}
+{{R&D_content|LBR Mainlines|[[User:OwenS|OwenS]]|checked|Checked|wip|Examination|unclaimed|In progress| | }}
 == Observation Log ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:50, 29 July 2006
Line 21:		Line 21:

	{{R&D\|LBR Mainlines\|[[User:OwenS\|OwenS]]\|checked\|Checked\|wip\|Examination\|unclaimed\|In progress\| \| }}		{{R&D\|LBR Mainlines\|[[User:OwenS\|OwenS]]\|checked\|Checked\|wip\|Examination\|unclaimed\|In progress\| \| }}
		+	{{R&D\|Multi speed trains with LBR Mainlines\|[[User:OwenS\|OwenS]]\|checked\|Checked\|wip\|Examination\|unclaimed\|In progress\| \| }}

	== Observation Log ==		== Observation Log ==