<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://wiki.openttdcoop.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AImplicit_Load_Balancing</id>
		<title>Talk:Implicit Load Balancing - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.openttdcoop.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AImplicit_Load_Balancing"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.openttdcoop.org/index.php?title=Talk:Implicit_Load_Balancing&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-12T12:42:36Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.25.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.openttdcoop.org/index.php?title=Talk:Implicit_Load_Balancing&amp;diff=6931&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Tneo: Made a remark about the concept.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.openttdcoop.org/index.php?title=Talk:Implicit_Load_Balancing&amp;diff=6931&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2007-12-23T14:01:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Made a remark about the concept.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;I'm observing the stations build in PSG #75 and my conclusion this far is, that you need to have a heavy loaded station to get the most benefit out of this construction. As well for now I don't see the advantages over &amp;quot;regular&amp;quot; load balancing of a station in PSG #74 it proved useful to load balance the entry, but not the exit, thus forcing trains a certain route. For now I'll continue making obversations. --[[User:Tneo|Tneo]] 14:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tneo</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>