Difference between revisions of "Talk:Line sync"

From #openttdcoop wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
(X-Sync illustration faults)
 
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
  
 
The X-Sync picture has tracks of different lengths before and after the X in the bridges version.  There are 6 straight squares before the X and 5 after. Does this matter?  I think it will matter if trains are very closely spaced.  It also lacks signalling for the second half; block signals before the X make the 2 bridges after the X just one block, which can't be right.  If you replace the screenshot, please don't use electric rails, they're confusing to look at. [[User:Eekee|Eekee]] ([[User talk:Eekee|talk]]) 19:49, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 
The X-Sync picture has tracks of different lengths before and after the X in the bridges version.  There are 6 straight squares before the X and 5 after. Does this matter?  I think it will matter if trains are very closely spaced.  It also lacks signalling for the second half; block signals before the X make the 2 bridges after the X just one block, which can't be right.  If you replace the screenshot, please don't use electric rails, they're confusing to look at. [[User:Eekee|Eekee]] ([[User talk:Eekee|talk]]) 19:49, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 +
 +
:It is synced; the different straight lengths do not matter. However it is also not signals so of course it would not work at all. You'd need path signals where the current two signals are because (as you mentioned) they are the same block. Or you could shorten the bridge to fit in block signals before the bridges. And of course it needs block signals filling in the empty spaces on both ends. [[User:Hazzard|Hazzard]] ([[User talk:Hazzard|talk]]) 06:46, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:46, 16 April 2019

The X-Sync picture has tracks of different lengths before and after the X in the bridges version. There are 6 straight squares before the X and 5 after. Does this matter? I think it will matter if trains are very closely spaced. It also lacks signalling for the second half; block signals before the X make the 2 bridges after the X just one block, which can't be right. If you replace the screenshot, please don't use electric rails, they're confusing to look at. Eekee (talk) 19:49, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

It is synced; the different straight lengths do not matter. However it is also not signals so of course it would not work at all. You'd need path signals where the current two signals are because (as you mentioned) they are the same block. Or you could shorten the bridge to fit in block signals before the bridges. And of course it needs block signals filling in the empty spaces on both ends. Hazzard (talk) 06:46, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Powered by MediaWiki
  • This page was last modified on 16 April 2019, at 06:46.