Difference between revisions of "LBR Mainlines"
From #openttdcoop wiki
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* Downgrades to LR more easily where needed | * Downgrades to LR more easily where needed | ||
* Allows both over and undertaking | * Allows both over and undertaking | ||
| + | * Relatively easy to upgrade to LL_RR in future (Although the junction limitations remain) | ||
'''Cons:''' | '''Cons:''' | ||
Revision as of 13:06, 27 July 2006
by OwenS
LBR Mainlines are arranged in a 3x1 configuration, of:
Left | Bidirectional | Right
Current stage: Development - Building first live test track
Pros:
- Takes up less track than an LL_RR mainline and can be compressed more
- Downgrades to LR more easily where needed
- Allows both over and undertaking
- Relatively easy to upgrade to LL_RR in future (Although the junction limitations remain)
Cons:
- More complex signalling
- Lower capacity than LL_RR
- Junction positions are restricted
Minimum width: 5 tiles: Primarily (L__B__R), Connectors (L_L_R_R)
