Difference between revisions of "LBR Mainlines"
From #openttdcoop wiki
m |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''Current stage: ''' Development - Building first live test track | '''Current stage: ''' Development - Building first live test track | ||
| − | ''' | + | '''Pros:''' |
| + | * Takes up less track than an LL_RR mainline and can be compressed more | ||
| + | * Downgrades to LR more easily where needed | ||
| + | * Allows both over and undertaking | ||
| − | '''Minimum width:'' 5 tiles: Primarily (L__B__R), Connectors (L_L_R_R) | + | '''Cons:''' |
| + | * More complex signalling | ||
| + | * Lower capacity than LL_RR | ||
| + | * Junction positions are restricted | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Minimum width:''' 5 tiles: Primarily (L__B__R), Connectors (L_L_R_R) | ||
[[Category:R&D]] | [[Category:R&D]] | ||
Revision as of 13:04, 27 July 2006
by OwenS
LBR Mainlines are arranged in a 3x1 configuration, of:
Left | Bidirectional | Right
Current stage: Development - Building first live test track
Pros:
- Takes up less track than an LL_RR mainline and can be compressed more
- Downgrades to LR more easily where needed
- Allows both over and undertaking
Cons:
- More complex signalling
- Lower capacity than LL_RR
- Junction positions are restricted
Minimum width: 5 tiles: Primarily (L__B__R), Connectors (L_L_R_R)
