Difference between revisions of "User talk:Osai/Repository"
From #openttdcoop wiki
(New page: Some points, I like to have you known: - old GRF Packs shouldn't be public available (at least not official) - there should not be a pack without a complete GRF Tabe (list of GRFs with cre...) |
m |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Some points, I like to have you known: | Some points, I like to have you known: | ||
− | + | * old GRF Packs shouldn't be public available (at least not official) | |
− | + | * there should not be a pack without a complete GRF Tabe (list of GRFs with credits and links to official download location) | |
I think, we should more work for a good solution to manage the GRF Table, then automatism of generating packs.... | I think, we should more work for a good solution to manage the GRF Table, then automatism of generating packs.... | ||
+ | |||
+ | for versioning, I vote for '''Nomenclature Type 2''' | ||
--[[User:Ammler|Ammler]] 18:17, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | --[[User:Ammler|Ammler]] 18:17, 16 February 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:42, 17 February 2008
Some points, I like to have you known:
- old GRF Packs shouldn't be public available (at least not official)
- there should not be a pack without a complete GRF Tabe (list of GRFs with credits and links to official download location)
I think, we should more work for a good solution to manage the GRF Table, then automatism of generating packs....
for versioning, I vote for Nomenclature Type 2
--Ammler 18:17, 16 February 2008 (UTC)