Difference between revisions of "Two-way Prio"

From #openttdcoop wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
(Added notes on gaps and load ratios)
Line 1: Line 1:
A standard prio gives priority to trains on the mainline and makes trains on the sideline way. In some join, especially at BBHs, a prio may build up long queues waiting to enter the mainline.
+
A standard prio gives priority to trains on the mainline and makes trains on the sideline wait. In some joins, especially at BBHs, a prio may build up long queues waiting to enter the mainline. The usual solution to this it to extend the mainline.
  
On PSG 178, we experimented with a concept named a Two-way Prio. The basic idea is that when the waiting trains begin to roll, they should keep rolling and not stop for a few trains on the ML. The mechanism is similar to a real-life traffic light. It releases all traffic in one direction and then switches to the other direction and releases all traffic from there (although, the Two-way prio does not have a timeout, like traffic lights).
+
The two-way prio is an intermediate solution that can increase the overall throughput of a join. The basic idea is that when a waiting train gets a chance to enter the line, every train behind it should also be allowed to enter. The mechanism is similar to a real-life traffic light. It releases all traffic in one direction and then switches to the other direction and releases all traffic from there (although, the Two-way prio does not have a timeout, like traffic lights).
  
 
[[File:twowayprio.gif]]
 
[[File:twowayprio.gif]]
 +
 +
A standard prio that is highly loaded tends to generate a pattern of trains with just one of the trains from the joining line between each block of trains from the joined line, with a gap between each join. The two-way prio allows all waiting trains to enter, so there will be overall fewer gaps.
  
 
== How to build ==
 
== How to build ==
Line 12: Line 14:
  
 
A place to use this is in BBHs where neither of the MLs is more major than the other. A simple join will leave huge gaps, and a standard prio may build big queues even with good balancing.
 
A place to use this is in BBHs where neither of the MLs is more major than the other. A simple join will leave huge gaps, and a standard prio may build big queues even with good balancing.
 +
 +
== Disadvantages ==
 +
 +
* When the load ratio between the lines is low, e.g. 1:20, the Two-way prio may not be as effective, as it leaves a gap between trains when it switches. This gap is bigger than on a standard prio and pre-accelerated prio's.
  
 
== Benefits ==
 
== Benefits ==
Line 18: Line 24:
 
* This usually give tight packing as the entire queue is release at once.
 
* This usually give tight packing as the entire queue is release at once.
 
* Adapts well to the traffic load. On light traffic, the logic train is usually blocked in the prio before a single train can reach it, leaving the path open.
 
* Adapts well to the traffic load. On light traffic, the logic train is usually blocked in the prio before a single train can reach it, leaving the path open.
 +
* Handles load ratios close to 1:1 very well, and cases when the load on the lines is very dynamic.

Revision as of 17:44, 15 March 2010

A standard prio gives priority to trains on the mainline and makes trains on the sideline wait. In some joins, especially at BBHs, a prio may build up long queues waiting to enter the mainline. The usual solution to this it to extend the mainline.

The two-way prio is an intermediate solution that can increase the overall throughput of a join. The basic idea is that when a waiting train gets a chance to enter the line, every train behind it should also be allowed to enter. The mechanism is similar to a real-life traffic light. It releases all traffic in one direction and then switches to the other direction and releases all traffic from there (although, the Two-way prio does not have a timeout, like traffic lights).

Twowayprio.gif

A standard prio that is highly loaded tends to generate a pattern of trains with just one of the trains from the joining line between each block of trains from the joined line, with a gap between each join. The two-way prio allows all waiting trains to enter, so there will be overall fewer gaps.

How to build

Add a small TL1 train on a segment that crosses the two lines. The TL1 train should be blocked by a standard prio in both direction by using a two-way entry signal.

A two-way prio does not need a long prio on the tracks. It just needs to be long enough that trains waiting will enter the prio before the logic train has a chance to switch.

A place to use this is in BBHs where neither of the MLs is more major than the other. A simple join will leave huge gaps, and a standard prio may build big queues even with good balancing.

Disadvantages

  • When the load ratio between the lines is low, e.g. 1:20, the Two-way prio may not be as effective, as it leaves a gap between trains when it switches. This gap is bigger than on a standard prio and pre-accelerated prio's.

Benefits

  • Releases entire queues in both directions at once without breaking the queue.
  • This usually give tight packing as the entire queue is release at once.
  • Adapts well to the traffic load. On light traffic, the logic train is usually blocked in the prio before a single train can reach it, leaving the path open.
  • Handles load ratios close to 1:1 very well, and cases when the load on the lines is very dynamic.
Powered by MediaWiki