Difference between revisions of "Talk:Presignal Bypass Station"
From #openttdcoop wiki
m (SL Terminus) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== SL Terminus == | == SL Terminus == | ||
| − | If this type of station were put as a terminus on an SL, would it work if all the entrances were on one side, the exits on the other, and an entrance/combo signal placed to allow trains to decide whether to choose the even or odd track numbers? One set of tracks (even/odd) would be at the higher elevation, while the other set would use the tunnel system as originally designed with the presignal bypass structure of the other. The exit tracks would remain as they are, minus the presignal bypass, and would eventually become the SL. | + | If this type of station were put as a terminus on an SL, would it work if all the entrances were on one side, the exits on the other, and an entrance/combo signal placed to allow trains to decide whether to choose the even or odd track numbers? One set of tracks (even/odd) would be at the higher elevation, while the other set would use the tunnel system as originally designed with the presignal bypass structure of the other. The exit tracks would remain as they are, minus the presignal bypass, and would eventually become the SL. [[User:Thraxian|Thraxian]] 13:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC) |
| − | I | + | Here are some screenshots. I have not added any signalling yet. The first image is the base case. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:PBS_Terminus_Short.png|500px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The second shows a possible expansion technique to increase number of inputs and outputs with minimal change to the station width (1 added width for the extra output track) Further expansion can be performed by adding additional bridges in the same fashion, and adding additional exit tracks as needed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:PBS_Terminus_Long.png|500px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'd welcome any feedback about this modification of the PBS design. [[User:Thraxian|Thraxian]] 14:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:52, 6 September 2007
I believe it'll work best with trains of various speeds, also a version with 2 entrances to presignal block would be even more efficient. ewanm89
Looks good, I agree with Ewanm89 it would work better with 2 entry streams but I think that may be difficult. Great work and an informative wiki article *thumbs up*. Sedontane
SL Terminus
If this type of station were put as a terminus on an SL, would it work if all the entrances were on one side, the exits on the other, and an entrance/combo signal placed to allow trains to decide whether to choose the even or odd track numbers? One set of tracks (even/odd) would be at the higher elevation, while the other set would use the tunnel system as originally designed with the presignal bypass structure of the other. The exit tracks would remain as they are, minus the presignal bypass, and would eventually become the SL. Thraxian 13:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Here are some screenshots. I have not added any signalling yet. The first image is the base case.
The second shows a possible expansion technique to increase number of inputs and outputs with minimal change to the station width (1 added width for the extra output track) Further expansion can be performed by adding additional bridges in the same fashion, and adding additional exit tracks as needed.
I'd welcome any feedback about this modification of the PBS design. Thraxian 14:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
