Perhaps editing and redirecting to Guides:Glossary would be more useful. It's confusing to have two pages with the same info.
Glossary is also linked to from more places.
--KenjiE20 12:40, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

And may be altogether mixed with Jargon, that already includes numerous abbreviations.
--Tuz 14:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

whoops, I didn't see that. I asked serveral times in the channel if there is an article like this and i got no answer. I'll take care of that later. --draconnier 14:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry that no-one obviously answered. Making this thing more uniform would certainly help the wiki and is also IMO one of its current short comings. Tackling that is certainly much appreciated. Once it's merged into a single page it then could also be made an autopilot command (e.g. !jargon or !glossary).--planetmaker 11:33, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Spending some thoughts on it, I think that the glossary is a good replace where the rest could re-direct to. It could be expanded though such that the abbreviations get their own entry, so that both, BBH and BackBoneHub (BBH) are a seperate entry. That'd make it easier, if a person encounters BBH and tries to get an idea what it is. Just my 2ct, no rule :) --planetmaker 11:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)